Is digital better ? Worse ? or simply different ?
|
|
Contributed by Deniz Merdanogullari
|
|
Tuesday, 29 November 2005 |
I bit the apple and it tasted good.
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 December 2005 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Patrick Jan Van Hove
|
|
Saturday, 26 February 2005 |
|
Today I made photographs. I took the time to get my MF camera when I was playing with my son and snapped a few pics (MF is great for that, at 12 shots per roll).
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 28 November 2005 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Patrick Jan Van Hove
|
|
Friday, 21 January 2005 |
It's a strange thing that almost all photography is presented on the web. Even the best screens don't have the same range of color and brightness rendition that a simple photographic print has, and don't get me started on resolution !
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 28 November 2005 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Friday, 14 January 2005 |
|
I'm one of those photographers who made the switch to digital when I felt that quality was getting close to 35mm film. I bought a Fujifilm S2 pro camera, because I already owned a couple of nikon lenses, and that i liked the superCCDs from Fuji. In the 7 months I had the camera, I probably shot more than 6 thousand frames, something I would have never done in film (that more than 150 rolls of film...). It "freed" me from thinking about per-frame cost when I was shooting, so I experimented, I tried lighting setups, subjects, macro, infrared, without any restraint.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Thursday, 13 January 2005 |
|
It all comes down to physics : a CCD sensor's sensitivity and dynamic range is linked to the size of each pixel. It's the same thing with film, sensitivity is directly linked to silver grain size.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
